| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libffi 3.1 release has been a bit aged and new architectures, compilers
have since been come on stage to compile it, we have been carrying
patches, but its better to use the latest 3.3 rc0 which has lot of these
issues handled and is in good shape.
Use 3.3~rc0 for PV to keep room for upgrade path without PE bump
fix the multilib header conflict
file /usr/include/ffi.h from install of libffi-dev-3.2.1+3.3+rc0-r0.core2_32 conflicts with file from package lib64-libffi-dev-3.2.1+3.3+rc0-r0.x86_64
(From OE-Core rev: 06e731bdea527d5c42e99bbcef7f2835e158c0a0)
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 7ae4ce08071c02beaf09675c2c1ed70617b797dd)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
(From OE-Core rev: a2c43ffe55e022cb5621d549c8aae914c6fa54a1)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
