summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-extended/zip/zip_3.0.bb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* zip: whitelist CVE-2018-13410 and CVE-2018-13684Mikko Rapeli2021-01-161-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13410 is disputed and also Debian considers it not a vulnerability: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-13410 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Jul/24 "Negligible security impact, would involve that a untrusted party controls the -TT value." https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13684 is not for zip, also Debian concludes this: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-13684 "NOT-FOR-US: smart contract implementation for ZIP" (From OE-Core rev: 06b72a91b6dcf63fed437fd2105c59e922ba6525) Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@bmw.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* zip: Add patch fixing zipnote segfaultJate Sujjavanich2020-01-101-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | This patch has been applied in several Linux distributions (From OE-Core rev: 8e662fced80c98c5495d49c905cc0008cb812589) Signed-off-by: Jate Sujjavanich <jatedev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* zip: Remove build date to improve reproducibilityJoshua Watt2019-06-041-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | Applies a patch from Debian to remove the build date from zip. (From OE-Core rev: 222d485e4eb789307093d57cb3c8d373c2e695b8) Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* selftest: fix distrodata.py to use per-recipe UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN settingAlexander Kanavin2017-08-161-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | ... instead of a global exception list which was problematic. [YOCTO #11896] (From OE-Core rev: 89dfede4ca795ba085f1ee7290c6dede573c11db) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* zip: update SRC_URIRoss Burton2016-05-191-8/+32
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The infozip FTP server appears to have been taken down, so change the SRC_URI to point at their SourceForge project. Also as the SRC_URI can't be generated from the version and there is no other user of the .inc, merge the .bb and .inc together. [ YOCTO #9655 ] (From OE-Core rev: 5cb1e0ec46e4fde1c15aeb6812eaaece4840ac1c) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* package_regex.inc: split entries which blacklist specific versions to their ↵Alexander Kanavin2015-12-081-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | recipes (From OE-Core rev: 1eb9e190ef3bb1170b3eaabd9f7900e7ce176624) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* zip: pay some attention to our CFLAGSJoe Slater2012-11-241-1/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Makefile makes use of CFLAGS_NOOPT. If we set that when calling make we can options like -g. The Makefile will override any optimization to -O3. Upstream-Status: Pending (From OE-Core rev: df2c260f9cda2e291c72f7debe1e6d53846ce058) Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* OECore license fixes: meta/*Elizabeth Flanagan2011-12-081-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: - LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked - LICENSE field has a license with no version - LICENSE field was actually incorrect - LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional SPDXLICENSEMAP entries. HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front. For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package. (From OE-Core rev: 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e) Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* SRC_URI Checksums AdditionalsSaul Wold2010-12-091-0/+3
| | | | Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
* packages: Separate out most of the remaining packages into recipesRichard Purdie2010-09-011-0/+6
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>