summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-extended/less/less_444.bb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* PR bump for all recipes that DEPEND on ncursesScott Garman2012-03-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The packaging changes to ncurses could break package feeds, so bump the PR on everythong that DEPENDS on ncurses. (From OE-Core rev: be92256917c157284ef8370bb93bbf443849b2e1) Signed-off-by: Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* less_444.bb: Adding license email from authorElizabeth Flanagan2012-02-241-3/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | This slipped off my plate. Adding the email response from the author of less which allows us to use a generic BSD instead of the less license. (From OE-Core rev: fa7bdf96b8eb8b5078db38249c5c60ec511c35c6) Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* less: Correcting generic licenseBeth Flanagan2011-12-211-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | I've asked and received permission from Mark Nudelman, the author of less, to utilize a generic BSD 2 clause license for less, instead of creating a common "less" license file. (From OE-Core rev: 37c8c2c5f6937520eaf9f5d981f9315e36eba4bb) Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* OECore license fixes: meta/*Elizabeth Flanagan2011-12-081-2/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: - LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked - LICENSE field has a license with no version - LICENSE field was actually incorrect - LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional SPDXLICENSEMAP entries. HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front. For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package. (From OE-Core rev: 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e) Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* less: Update to 444Saul Wold2011-12-021-0/+30
(From OE-Core rev: ee1242197c1458e690ffb4c70e28bf8a0339eb0f) Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>