| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed on the mailing lists, using a suffix to package names is
hard and has lead to many recipes having to do PKGSUFFIX games. Its
looking extremely hard to scale nativesdk much further without hacking
many recipes.
By comparison, using a prefix like multilib does works much better and
doesn't involve "hacking" as many recipes. This change converts nativesdk
to use a prefix using the existing multilib infrastructure.
(From OE-Core rev: 81813c0e322dc04ce4b069117188d8a54dfddb8c)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
follow Richard's approach, modify bzip2-native recipe to install bzip2 package
binaries to STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE/bzip2-native to avoid problems when other
package is doing upack to reference bzip2. libbz2.so* still installs to
STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE.
change python-native to depends on bzip2-replacement-native instead of
bzip2-full-native and add EXTRANATIVEPATH for bzip2-native.
Didn't add bzip2native.bbclass as python-native is the only user so far.
(From OE-Core rev: 5bf3541836457465aa76577bfb41cdf6316213c9)
Signed-off-by: Yao Zhao <yao.zhao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(From OE-Core rev: 75cd7692c97b07e05f304893995231e2d3390f8f)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Create libbz2 (and -dev, -staticdev), which can be
installed without the bzip2 executables.
(From OE-Core rev: e27af1f273e9a7348dd8f5542df9206acd9210f3)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
(From OE-Core rev: 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e)
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Add Summary information and update descriptions as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
resolves security bug CVE-2010-0405
Signed-off-by: Qing He <qing.he@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
