| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This CVE patch is actually against Chromium as they ship an internal fork of
libxml2 and breaks ABI. The real issue has been resolved in libxslt 1.1.27, and
we're shipping 1.1.28.
(From OE-Core rev: e6c60252ab4ba6842f63c6b8a519a85f2ff238fb)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(From OE-Core rev: 2d5c457bf888771891e9c29e82ec5a5cecace528)
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Install libxml2 test suite and run it as ptest.
(From OE-Core rev: 22cf4cc85fbe21a53ca4684b0b06b9af20b2ecc5)
Signed-off-by: Mihaela Sendrea <mihaela.sendrea@enea.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the patch come from:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/third_party/libxml/src \
/include/libxml/tree.h?r1=56276&r2=149930
libxml2 2.9.0-rc1 and earlier, as used in Google Chrome before 21.0.1180.89,
does not properly support a cast of an unspecified variable during handling
of XSL transforms, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted document, related to the
_xmlNs data structure in include/libxml/tree.h.
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-2871
[YOCTO #3580]
[ CQID: WIND00376779 ]
Upstream-Status: Pending
(From OE-Core rev: bc601f96f34ad17a87f599b58e502ec1b2c13fa3)
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cmake looks at all include statements, even if they're not used. To make
builds deterministic and avoid needing to add binutils as a dependency
for libzypp, completely remove the include from the header file, even if
it is never used.
This avoids issues where you'd build binutils, then libzypp, then remove
binutils (and hence ansidecl.h) and then recompile libzypp which would
still have the dependency and hence fail.
(From OE-Core rev: bfaaeb44c5023e2d2a9414c07694c75fa527283b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
removed 2 patches that are now fixed upstream
updated hash.c LIC_FILES_CHKSUM due to updating the date to 2012
(From OE-Core rev: b13b2894217ba085931b2a0410b7715d7fa13868)
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(From OE-Core rev: b126d638b7da9cc9e3c7f164e6dca3a1fce5c4ce)
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes an issue with RPM where it checks version imformation for
binaries linked against libxml and fails because it's missing info
| error: Failed dependencies:
| libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0) is needed by fmc-0.9.7+2-r2.1.ppce500mc
| libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30) is needed by fmc-0.9.7+2-r2.1.ppce500mc
| ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see
Note: fmc is just an example recipe/name
(From OE-Core rev: d1f1fec5c6fe980aaf2c1f1dc2a0e737f4adf2dd)
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[YOCTO #978]
from 2.7.7
fixes CVE-2010-4008
(From OE-Core rev: cd13726f1eb1f77f55cf202830d6bf13b47b0860)
Signed-off-by: Qing He <qing.he@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
Having one monolithic packages directory makes it hard to find things
and is generally overwhelming. This commit splits it into several
logical sections roughly based on function, recipes.txt gives more
information about the classifications used.
The opportunity is also used to switch from "packages" to "recipes"
as used in OpenEmbedded as the term "packages" can be confusing to
people and has many different meanings.
Not all recipes have been classified yet, this is just a first pass
at separating things out. Some packages are moved to meta-extras as
they're no longer actively used or maintained.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
