| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"bitbake recipe -ccleansstate" should remove binary pkgs from deploy dir
as normal cleansstate does without packagefeed-stability.bbclass.
(From OE-Core rev: 0865a5b8b8fbf478fb4b2310f808bcffff84a091)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Fix multilib + rpm since its multilib package name is special.
* Update SSTATE_DUPWHITELIST to avoid shared location conflicted error.
* Fix message when "not copying", now the messages are:
Copying packages for recipe <foo>
Not copying packages for recipe <foo>
(From OE-Core rev: 647fc7913c3d1f98efe36f01fd4e0edf2366e1a6)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A recipes can generate several rpms such as a.rpm, a-dev.rpm, a-dbg.rpm,
when update one of them in the repo, we'd better update all of them,
otherwise, there might be a-dev.r0.1.rpm and a-dbg.r0.3.rpm in the repo,
which looks strange.
(From OE-Core rev: 2a7f203dbe4fda5dba9137503e93669392719aba)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* fix for python3
iteritems() -> items()
* Return immediately for native and cross.
* Remove the usage of __BBDELTASKS, there is no such var in bitbake.
(From OE-Core rev: ccfc13adedd97f57024420639053080e047529dc)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
When a dependency causes a recipe to effectively be rebuilt, its output
may in fact not change; but new packages (with an increased PR value, if
using the PR server) will be generated nonetheless. There's no practical
way for us to predict whether or not this is going to be the case based
solely on the inputs, but we can compare the package output and see if
that is materially different and based upon that decide to replace the
old package with the new one.
This class effectively intercepts packages as they are written out by
do_package_write_*, causing them to be written into a different
directory where we can compare them to whatever older packages might
be in the "real" package feed directory, and avoid copying the new
package to the feed if it has not materially changed. We use
build-compare to do the package comparison.
(From OE-Core rev: cc8b1a93912f830e605e6249c446b3764e550863)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
