| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
handling changes
With the separate of the "-only" and "-or-later" licenses, we need to
update the tests to match the messages now given in the output.
Also use a mix of canonicalised and non-canonlised names in the
reference recipes to help test those cases and ensure coverage.
(From OE-Core rev: b7f38af7ac9449178c603c5349808b8c0dd84d35)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suggested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@streamunlimited.com>
(From OE-Core rev: ef7c44c9bdf30a02ccc71f26c27aab45d6adf1fb)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
One bug went unnoticed without these selftests: an INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE
with a non-SPDX license for a package with that non-SPDX license wasn't
enforcing the denial of build for said package. See
4b6ce4604cc15e289a48f8586d58a101b7a70b52 ("meta: license: fix non-SPDX
license being removed from INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE")
While adding a test for that particular case, let's add a few more so
that we cover a handful more use cases of INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE.
(From OE-Core rev: 6c2ca52218c196e7ccf6b3275bffc3e3a04193c6)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@streamunlimited.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|