summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/bitbake/lib/bblayers/action.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* bitbake: bitbake-layers: remove-layer: support removing multiple layers at a ↵Paul Eggleton2017-11-211-9/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | time If you can add multiple layers at once, it stands to reason that you should also be able to remove more than one at a time. (Bitbake rev: 2f2033836a5ce4064d9e4f263788a563001bc008) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: bitbake-layers: add-layer: enable adding multiple layers at oncePaul Eggleton2017-11-211-11/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow specifying multiple layers with bitbake-layers add-layer so that you can add more than one in a single command. This is not just useful, it's actually pretty important if you need to add a layer and its dependencies at the same time - since we now go through a parse process when the layer is added, without this you have to add them all in just the right order and wait for the parse each time which is somewhat painful. (Bitbake rev: ad6b14f01aa326a1c6baa31bfac33be238bce805) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: bitbake-layers: check layer dependencies before addingChang Rebecca Swee Fun2017-06-061-4/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In the original implementation, "bitbake-layers add-layers <layer>" succeeded without error checking. This will further introduce failures in recipe parsing only when "bitbake" command is executed. Adding a meta layer without its dependency layer(s) should failed and exit the process gracefully. Added extra argument "-F" to force add a layer without checking layer dependency. [YOCTO #10913] (Bitbake rev: 705ab252e631903e6d2e46202b419a9e8adcd861) Signed-off-by: Phoong Stanley Cheong Kwan <stanley.cheong.kwan.phoong@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: bitbake: remove True option to getVar callsJoshua Lock2016-11-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace. Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\(( ?[^,()]*), True\) (Bitbake rev: 3b45c479de8640f92dd1d9f147b02e1eecfaadc8) Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: bitbake: Initial multi-config supportRichard Purdie2016-08-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds the notion of supporting multiple configurations within a single build. To enable it, set a line in local.conf like: BBMULTICONFIG = "configA configB configC" This would tell bitbake that before it parses the base configuration, it should load conf/configA.conf and so on for each different configuration. These would contain lines like: MACHINE = "A" or other variables which can be set which can be built in the same build directory (or change TMPDIR not to conflict). One downside I've already discovered is that if we want to inherit this file right at the start of parsing, the only place you can put the configurations is in "cwd", since BBPATH isn't constructed until the layers are parsed and therefore using it as a preconf file isn't possible unless its located there. Execution of these targets takes the form "bitbake multiconfig:configA:core-image-minimal core-image-sato" so similar to our virtclass approach for native/nativesdk/multilib using BBCLASSEXTEND. Implementation wise, the implication is that instead of tasks being uniquely referenced with "recipename/fn:task" it now needs to be "configuration:recipename:task". We already started using "virtual" filenames for recipes when we implemented BBCLASSEXTEND and this patch adds a new prefix to these, "multiconfig:<configname>:" and hence avoid changes to a large part of the codebase thanks to this. databuilder has an internal array of data stores and uses the right one depending on the supplied virtual filename. That trick allows us to use the existing parsing code including the multithreading mostly unchanged as well as most of the cache code. For recipecache, we end up with a dict of these accessed by multiconfig (mc). taskdata and runqueue can only cope with one recipecache so for taskdata, we pass in each recipecache and have it compute the result and end up with an array of taskdatas. We can only have one runqueue so there extensive changes there. This initial implementation has some drawbacks: a) There are no inter-multi-configuration dependencies as yet b) There are no sstate optimisations. This means if the build uses the same object twice in say two different TMPDIRs, it will either load from an existing sstate cache at the start or build it twice. We can then in due course look at ways in which it would only build it once and then reuse it. This will likely need significant changes to the way sstate currently works to make that possible. (Bitbake rev: 5287991691578825c847bac2368e9b51c0ede3f0) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: bitbake: Convert to python 3Richard Purdie2016-06-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Various misc changes to convert bitbake to python3 which don't warrant separation into separate commits. (Bitbake rev: d0f904d407f57998419bd9c305ce53e5eaa36b24) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: bitbake-layers: convert to plugin-basedChristopher Larson2016-05-171-0/+233
This uses bb.utils.load_plugins, based on the plugin handling in recipetool and devtool in oe-core. (Bitbake rev: 5e542df9b966a99b5a5b8aa7cf6100174aff54b2) Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>