| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current approach to remote datastores used in tinfoil is breaking. For
example, adding a devupstream extension to a recipe with a git upstream,
making it the preferred version and then running "devtool modify" on it
causes get_srcrev() circular dependency issues. The problem is the override
handling in the datastore is broken.
This gets broken since remotedata:recieve_datastore() sets d.dict but doesn't
update d.overridedata (or d.inchistory or d.varhistory). We could play
whack-a-mole but the current implementation seems to be flawed to me. It
also doesn't cover, or only partially covers some datastore operations and
each needs new dedicated command API.
Instead, step back and reimplement the way the datastore connector works.
With this change, the datastore is either remote or local but the data is not
spread on two sides of the connection. All the API is proxied over the connection
by a single function for the datastore (and two to support variable history
and include history).
This code does not support using the datastore as a parameter to any data store
functions. We did have one case of that but its just bad code and can be
replaced.
The result is something which is much simpler and less invasive to the datastore
code itself, meaning its behaviour should be much more consistent. The existing
tests for the remote data no longer make any sense and are removed.
The one bug this code would have is if key/value pairs are returned over the IPC
and those values contained a DataSmart object since we don't recurse into return
values to find such things. Nothing appears to do that currently so lets worry
about it if its ever an issue. This change should simplfy a ton of other issues
and avoid a ton of other bugs so is a huge net gain.
Tested with bitbake's and OE's selftests.
(Bitbake rev: 85e03a64dd0a4ebe71009ec4bdf4192c04a9786e)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the introduction of SPDX-License-Identifier headers, we don't need a ton
of header boilerplate in every file. Simplify the files and rely on the top
level for the full licence text.
(Bitbake rev: 695d84397b68cc003186e22f395caa378b06bc75)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds the SPDX-License-Identifier license headers to the majority of
our source files to make it clearer exactly which license files are under.
The bulk of the files are under GPL v2.0 with one found to be under V2.0
or later, some under MIT and some have dual license. There are some files
which are potentially harder to classify where we've imported upstream code
and those can be handled specifically in later commits.
The COPYING file is replaced with LICENSE.X files which contain the full
license texts.
(Bitbake rev: ff237c33337f4da2ca06c3a2c49699bc26608a6b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For the purposes of server-side parsing and expansion allowing for
client-side use of the datastore, we need a means of sending a datastore
from the client back to the server, where the datastore probably
consists of a remote (server-side) original plus some client-side
modifications. To do this we need to take care of a couple of things:
1) xmlrpc can't handle nested dicts, so if you enable memres and simply
try passing a serialised datastore then things break. Instead of
serialising the entire datastore, just take the naive option of
transferring the internal dict alone (as a list of tuples) for now.
2) Change the TinfoilDataStoreConnector object into simply the handle
(number) when transmitting; it gets substituted with the real
datastore when the server receives it.
(Bitbake rev: 784d2f1a024efe632fc9049ce5b78692d419d938)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
Rewrite tinfoil as a wrapper around the UI, instead of the earlier
approach of starting up just enough of cooker to do what we want. This
has several advantages:
* It now works when bitbake is memory-resident instead of failing with
"ERROR: Only one copy of bitbake should be run against a build
directory".
* We can now connect an actual UI, thus you get things like the recipe
parsing / cache loading progress bar and parse error handling for free
* We can now handle events generated by the server if we wish to do so
* We can potentially extend this to do more stuff, e.g. actually running
build operations - this needs to be made more practical before we can
use it though (since you effectively have to become the UI yourself
for this at the moment.)
The downside is that tinfoil no longer has direct access to cooker, the
global datastore, or the cache. To mitigate this I have extended
data_smart to provide remote access capability for the datastore, and
created "fake" cooker and cooker.recipecache / cooker.collection adapter
objects in order to avoid breaking too many tinfoil-using scripts that
might be out there (we've never officially documented tinfoil or
BitBake's internal code, but we can still make accommodations where
practical). I've at least gone far enough to support all of the
utilities that use tinfoil in OE-Core with some changes, but I know
there are scripts such as Chris Larson's "bb" out there that do make
other calls into BitBake code that I'm not currently providing access to
through the adapters.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #5470].
(Bitbake rev: 3bbf8d611c859f74d563778115677a04f5c4ab43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
