summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* lib/oe/patch.py: add a warning if patch context was ignoredAlexander Kanavin2018-03-151-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ignoring patch context increases the chances of patches being applied incorrectly. Depending on what code is being patched, this can go completely unnoticed and create subtle bugs, sometimes with security implications. Please see here for a specific example: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450 On the other hand, we cannot simply force all patch context to match exactly: doing this would break a lot of recipes suddenly, across all layers. So let's try a softer approach: issue a warning, and gently update patches over a longer span of time. When most of the warnings are eliminated, we can start enforcing a strict patch application policy. I do understand that this patch creates a lot of warnings all of a sudden, however I believe the problem does need to be addressed. All of oe-core recipes have their context already fixed. Sample warning: WARNING: vulkan-1.0.61.1-r0 do_patch: Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches. The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool: devtool modify <recipe> devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path> Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace) should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen when some of the context is ignored). Details: Applying patch demos-Don-t-build-tri-or-cube.patch patching file demos/CMakeLists.txt Hunk #1 succeeded at 63 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 76 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines). [YOCTO #10450] (From OE-Core rev: 5133fd46bccf14e21680f8d94e952914edccb113) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* oe-selftest: add a test for failing package post-installation scriptletsAlexander Kanavin2018-03-152-1/+50
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The test runs a scriptlet that has an intentionally failing command in the middle and checks for two things: 1) that bitbake does warn the user about the failure 2) that scriptlet execution stops at that point. The test is run for all three package types: rpm, deb, ipk. (From OE-Core rev: 865fafb0dff19d27bd417c28c95fb8fdf0326a2b) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py: warn about failing scriptlets for all ↵Alexander Kanavin2018-03-151-3/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | package types Previously this was done only for rpm packages; now also ipk/deb scriptlet failures are reported. In the future this will become a hard error, but it can't yet happen due to the legacy 'exit 1' way of deferring scriptlet execution to first boot which needs a deprecation period. (From OE-Core rev: a36671faf6e0b7623185b0e22814a786d5444592) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* package.bbclass: run pre/post installation/removal scriptlets using sh -eAlexander Kanavin2018-03-152-4/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows catching errors in the scriptlets which would otherwise go unnoticed, e.g. this sequence: ==== bogus_command proper_command ==== would work just fine without any visible warnings or errors. This was previously done only for rpm packages; this patch replaces the rpm-specific tweak with one that works for all package types. (From OE-Core rev: a0aa12e1d0ea9064b8dd816d4e82238df765506b) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* unfs3: Fix libtirpc usage for unfs3-native versionRichard Purdie2018-03-151-2/+2
| | | | | | (From OE-Core rev: e37c4f1ff2b440b0a232b0482c136cc9f7b24e0f) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libtirpc: Extend to native and nativesdk recipesKhem Raj2018-03-151-0/+2
| | | | | | | (From OE-Core rev: 49d5d53c64ea18b897908c23764d1817bec64775) Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* unfs3: Fix build with muslKhem Raj2018-03-153-7/+44
| | | | | | | | | | | Should also fix build on new build hosts where with glibc 2.27 rpc support is dropped in favor of libtirpc (From OE-Core rev: 86f4c68c76098d6735b4cb640996d748b8ff82fb) Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* openssl_1.0.2n: improve reproducibilityJuro Bystricky2018-03-154-0/+49
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve reproducible build of: openssl-staticdev openssl-dbg libcrypto There are two main causes that prevent reproducible build, both related to the generated file "buildinf.h": 1. "buildinf.h" contains build host CFLAGS, containing various build host references. We need to pass sanitized CFLAGS to the script generating this file ("mkbuildinf.pl". ) 2. We also need to modify the script "mkbuildinf.pl" itsel in order to generate a build timestamp based on SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, if present in the environment. (From OE-Core rev: 6c556ed3553d8f5e75d65cd7db92b26df43846b7) Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* bitbake: utils.py: Add option for explode_dep_versions2 to return unsortedAmanda Brindle2018-03-151-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | Before, explode_dep_versions2 would sort the OrderedDict before returning. This function will still sort the OrderedDict by default, but will now have the option to return the OrderedDict unsorted. This option will allow us to check if the order of the package list has changed. (Bitbake rev: 39d6a30a28f66c599e18beddbd847f40dcff623c) Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* dbus-test-ptest: improve reproducibilityJuro Bystricky2018-03-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Remove build host references from additional files. (From OE-Core rev: 073d8d001033471d7fe44f52212c72a6c3541313) Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* reproducible_build_simple.bbclass: simple environment for reproducible binariesJuro Bystricky2018-03-121-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Export environmental variables needed for binary reproducibility with consistent values. This class can be used either directly via: INHERIT += "reproducible_build_simple" or can be inherited by a more complex/complete bbclass, for example a bblass which will crack SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for each recipe. (From OE-Core rev: 5c2685c5ee2f8210a36b9a8591491b6af0482084) Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* classes/recipes: Use expanded BUILD_REPRODUCIBLE_BINARIES valueJuro Bystricky2018-03-124-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | Replace the occurences of BUILD_REPRODUCIBLE_BINARIES with expanded values ${BUILD_REPRODUCIBLE_BINARIES} so the variable does not need to be exported. (From OE-Core rev: 27f87bbc8395a2481ef808465a62d213a6b678ac) Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* yocto-uninative: Upgrade to 1.8 version with glibc 2.27Richard Purdie2018-03-111-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | Now distros are starting to ship glibc 2.27 we need a uninatve version which contains glibc 2.27 which is in the 1.8 version. (From OE-Core rev: 0a1a1daac661046b0bf287b63267d58e0ab03e8e) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* lsbinitscripts: update to 9.79Alexander Kanavin2018-03-112-13/+16
| | | | | | | | | | Switch to github as pkgs.fedoraproject.org is down. (From OE-Core rev: d3a6d7895f8f68042aa5b6c3ce0dcc915f330bd6) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* mklibs-native: refresh patchesAlexander Kanavin2018-03-111-12/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 7b1dfc0f67905435906ae806987e945134311045) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* attr: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-30/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 9a0465bd26a8359c8b432595589a13f295f2de2d) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libunwind: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-13/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 268186429d10047796a4801baf95ae8a8f722658) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libtiff: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 8d4dd42cf39ac33e2479cb4f9f833701d68cea62) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* cryptodev: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-21/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: cecd562742c94f223c92bf5426148967fc9a8054) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* blktrace: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-4/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 0666146a9f12c90e2b5f9fd3b03b21429fb9327c) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* xorg-xserver: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 77fb72c76c8a5b2229a32f36a913a3293e9d2b56) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* acpica: remove unnecesary no-werror.patchAlexander Kanavin2018-03-112-33/+0
| | | | | | | | | | It became out of date (missing newly added files), and seems no longer necessary for builds. (From OE-Core rev: 54ca13f0dae8707a7fcbaa308dd797619defb823) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* mesa: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-112-19/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 0cff8ae54066b25ffbe1efaa3f0a1d84aa89ebe1) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* drm: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-14/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 625be3dd6e3069333a3c94ca8f23129b23e4425b) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* gtk-doc: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-10/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 3277e60b6eefb3a1c858462bc89244f6577dca52) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* gnome: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-8/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 9c762156d5eab1582fdd1f5000e80a0a67d46152) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* sysstat: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-10/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 53f2bbba35c63afa14c5fcb33b83b0ee061840ca) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* rpcbind: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-9/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: df9b991d1f453aae4dca5558f10fd23e866778dc) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* newt: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-14/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 8820d4ffa493d49212f4d8f2665d15c7070a7477) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* net-tools: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-25/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 561e89baf77741dfa5af9c645f7c471cd7b3880b) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* ltp: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-112-56/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 040b4bb125e28750e089f631c1debb088bb3bc9f) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* ethtool: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 93fca640e97643f94ef4f4a5d96c30c971058ec9) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* cups: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-9/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 9f58bd731f33b90849d7d0cb8153dcfedf336ff4) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* tcf-agent: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-6/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 9f77858360b33de6c4f66638fea8a8051fb6208f) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* ruby: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-10/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 44e650f961888b75797da8ecc23654f672c5fae6) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* qemu: drop already applied glibc-2.25.patchAlexander Kanavin2018-03-112-75/+0
| | | | | | | | | | Due to patch fuzz it was applied again in a different place. (From OE-Core rev: c1596c6a26bc099a5f27f8a7f9feb7d07bd30cd5) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* qemu: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-112-22/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: a5c1069d2c0570186792d61151e1865642afd73a) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* python: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-116-168/+166
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 8a5c1328c4ea63443a92813c54bd2229c9959ff9) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* opkg-utils: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-112-16/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: ca733ba0e28d6d4c199e149ce8ae428397dfa51f) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* m4: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-5/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 87118e6a2ed6da1ceaf484c326ec6d0ac8c1b8be) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* i2c-tools: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-14/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 00677e03156228f752476520911c19d4156db8da) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* gcc: drop patch that is already upstreamAlexander Kanavin2018-03-112-52/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | Due to patch fuzz, it was applied again, so the same code sequence was repeated twice. Not sure if that caused any bugs, but certainly wasn't the right thing to do. (From OE-Core rev: e3a50788bfeabbde226e280803a01dd7f765b2bc) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* e2fsprogs: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-112-21/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 6a83aca280fece30fd7c17f32f07f592f6300c6c) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* openssl: drop openssl-1.0.2a-x32-asm.patchAlexander Kanavin2018-03-112-47/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch was applied in a completely incorrect spot (due to fuzz), no one noticed or complained. Meanwhile upstream says the issue has been resolved differently: https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3759&user=guest&pass=guest (From OE-Core rev: 325e516b59e677dc8e2c5756589fa8037b3e9392) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* openssl: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-112-12/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 7baba7a19c5610a63ccbfd6a2238667772b32118) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* iproute2: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 3d33f83ffa8ba2a36a03489b16292d3132f0eb27) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* avahi: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-10/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 6c0329389ffd82552c9302d70c8b2a1dfc94ce00) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* u-boot: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 7e8273cb55df71eaaf2cd50db076b73229ef7566) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* pcmciautils: drop duplicate chunk from pcmciautils-018/makefile_race.patchAlexander Kanavin2018-03-111-14/+0
| | | | | | | | | | The new rule was patched into the makefile twice. (From OE-Core rev: c52228f4d0711ab7d75f9f860f637c6351dccd63) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* pciutils: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-111-13/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 7d56245a4859727f85dc5ae6f881d0783dee1ce1) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf (git 2.39.0) at 2024-11-14 12:34:37 +0000