1 files changed, 0 insertions, 38 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/trace-cmd/trace-cmd/trace-cmd-Do-not-call-stop_threads-if-doing-latency-.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/trace-cmd/trace-cmd/trace-cmd-Do-not-call-stop_threads-if-doing-latency-.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 4c00c512bb..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/trace-cmd/trace-cmd/trace-cmd-Do-not-call-stop_threads-if-doing-latency-.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-From 356dee73d9ced3e019dea2883a7f357fd4664b3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@windriver.com>
-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:19:45 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH] trace-cmd: Do not call stop_threads() if doing latency
- tracing
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-
-If we are using a latency tracer we do not call start_threads() we
-should therefore not call stop_threads() if 'latency'. Attempting
-to call stop_threads() without first calling start_threads() will
-cause a segfault since pids will be uninitialized.
-
-Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333653586-3379-3-git-send-email-mark.asselstine@windriver.com
-
-Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@windriver.com>
-Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
----
- trace-record.c |    3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/trace-record.c b/trace-record.c
-index fcec28b..1c56fa9 100644
---- a/trace-record.c
-+++ b/trace-record.c
-@@ -2216,7 +2216,8 @@ void trace_record (int argc, char **argv)
-                }
- 
-                disable_tracing();
--               stop_threads();
-+               if (!latency)
-+                       stop_threads();
-        }
- 
-        for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++) {
--- 
-1.7.10.4
-