1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0011-EAP-pwd-server-Verify-received-scalar-and-element.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0011-EAP-pwd-server-Verify-received-scalar-and-element.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..87095bf7f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0011-EAP-pwd-server-Verify-received-scalar-and-element.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+From 70ff850e89fbc8bc7da515321b4d15b5eef70581 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mathy Vanhoef <mathy.vanhoef@nyu.edu>
+Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:13:06 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH 11/14] EAP-pwd server: Verify received scalar and element
+
+When processing an EAP-pwd Commit frame, the peer's scalar and element
+(elliptic curve point) were not validated. This allowed an adversary to
+bypass authentication, and impersonate any user if the crypto
+implementation did not verify the validity of the EC point.
+
+Fix this vulnerability by assuring the received scalar lies within the
+valid range, and by checking that the received element is not the point
+at infinity and lies on the elliptic curve being used. (CVE-2019-9498)
+
+The vulnerability is only exploitable if OpenSSL version 1.0.2 or lower
+is used, or if LibreSSL or wolfssl is used. Newer versions of OpenSSL
+(and also BoringSSL) implicitly validate the elliptic curve point in
+EC_POINT_set_affine_coordinates_GFp(), preventing the attack.
+
+Signed-off-by: Mathy Vanhoef <mathy.vanhoef@nyu.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+CVE: CVE-2019-9498
+---
+ src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c
+index d0fa54a..74979da 100644
+--- a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c
++++ b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c
+@@ -718,6 +718,26 @@ eap_pwd_process_commit_resp(struct eap_sm *sm, struct eap_pwd_data *data,
+                goto fin;
+        }
+ 
++       /* verify received scalar */
++       if (crypto_bignum_is_zero(data->peer_scalar) ||
++           crypto_bignum_is_one(data->peer_scalar) ||
++           crypto_bignum_cmp(data->peer_scalar,
++                             crypto_ec_get_order(data->grp->group)) >= 0) {
++               wpa_printf(MSG_INFO,
++                          "EAP-PWD (server): received scalar is invalid");
++               goto fin;
++       }
++
++       /* verify received element */
++       if (!crypto_ec_point_is_on_curve(data->grp->group,
++                                        data->peer_element) ||
++           crypto_ec_point_is_at_infinity(data->grp->group,
++                                          data->peer_element)) {
++               wpa_printf(MSG_INFO,
++                          "EAP-PWD (server): received element is invalid");
++               goto fin;
++       }
++
+        /* check to ensure peer's element is not in a small sub-group */
+        if (!crypto_bignum_is_one(cofactor)) {
+                if (crypto_ec_point_mul(data->grp->group, data->peer_element,
+-- 
+2.7.4
+