diff options
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch | 82 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb | 3 |
2 files changed, 84 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0a0e064451 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ | |||
1 | From 82fdddd1c4e37881db9b4c6a944261521c6f10ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | ||
2 | From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> | ||
3 | Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 00:57:59 +0000 | ||
4 | Subject: [PATCH] PR ld/13470 * elf32-ppc.c | ||
5 | (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive | ||
6 | change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment. * | ||
7 | elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise. | ||
8 | |||
9 | --- | ||
10 | bfd/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ | ||
11 | bfd/elf32-ppc.c | 14 ++++++++++---- | ||
12 | bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 14 ++++++++++---- | ||
13 | 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) | ||
14 | |||
15 | |||
16 | Upstream-Status: Backport | ||
17 | |||
18 | Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> | ||
19 | Index: binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c | ||
20 | =================================================================== | ||
21 | --- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011-11-21 01:29:21.000000000 -0800 | ||
22 | +++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2012-05-31 14:28:48.273784929 -0700 | ||
23 | @@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ | ||
24 | edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; | ||
25 | edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed; | ||
26 | |||
27 | - /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ | ||
28 | - if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) | ||
29 | - return; | ||
30 | - | ||
31 | if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) | ||
32 | { | ||
33 | if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL) | ||
34 | @@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ | ||
35 | eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; | ||
36 | } | ||
37 | |||
38 | + /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. | ||
39 | + You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, | ||
40 | + both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just | ||
41 | + moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS | ||
42 | + code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for | ||
43 | + dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the | ||
44 | + DIR sym here. */ | ||
45 | + if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) | ||
46 | + return; | ||
47 | + | ||
48 | /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to | ||
49 | the symbol which just became indirect. */ | ||
50 | edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount; | ||
51 | Index: binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c | ||
52 | =================================================================== | ||
53 | --- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011-11-21 01:29:24.000000000 -0800 | ||
54 | +++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2012-05-31 14:28:48.285784951 -0700 | ||
55 | @@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ | ||
56 | edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak; | ||
57 | edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; | ||
58 | |||
59 | - /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ | ||
60 | - if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) | ||
61 | - return; | ||
62 | - | ||
63 | /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */ | ||
64 | if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) | ||
65 | { | ||
66 | @@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ | ||
67 | eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; | ||
68 | } | ||
69 | |||
70 | + /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. | ||
71 | + You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, | ||
72 | + both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just | ||
73 | + moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS | ||
74 | + code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for | ||
75 | + dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the | ||
76 | + DIR sym here. */ | ||
77 | + if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) | ||
78 | + return; | ||
79 | + | ||
80 | /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the | ||
81 | symbol which just became indirect. */ | ||
82 | if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL) | ||
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb index 9f62883ff3..7b6adef122 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.22.bb | |||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
1 | require binutils.inc | 1 | require binutils.inc |
2 | 2 | ||
3 | PR = "r8" | 3 | PR = "r9" |
4 | 4 | ||
5 | LIC_FILES_CHKSUM="\ | 5 | LIC_FILES_CHKSUM="\ |
6 | file://src-release;endline=17;md5=4830a9ef968f3b18dd5e9f2c00db2d35\ | 6 | file://src-release;endline=17;md5=4830a9ef968f3b18dd5e9f2c00db2d35\ |
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\ | |||
32 | file://binutils-powerpc-e5500.patch \ | 32 | file://binutils-powerpc-e5500.patch \ |
33 | file://binutils-armv5e.patch \ | 33 | file://binutils-armv5e.patch \ |
34 | file://mips64-default-ld-emulation.patch \ | 34 | file://mips64-default-ld-emulation.patch \ |
35 | file://0001-PR-ld-13470.patch \ | ||
35 | " | 36 | " |
36 | 37 | ||
37 | SRC_URI[md5sum] = "ee0f10756c84979622b992a4a61ea3f5" | 38 | SRC_URI[md5sum] = "ee0f10756c84979622b992a4a61ea3f5" |