OECore license fixes: meta/*

This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:

- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist

This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.

HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit

That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.

(From OE-Core rev: 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e)

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb
index 224cec0f82..1534cd91d3 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 DESCRIPTION = "Firmware files for use with Linux kernel"
 SECTION = "kernel"
+# Notes:
+# This is kind of a mess. Each bit of firmware has their own license. Some free
+# some not. Leaving this as Proprietary for now, but this recipe should be probably
+# be rethought out a bit more around how it deals with licenses.
+
 LICENSE = "Proprietary"
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.radeon_rlc;md5=4c243f7854d2884b483abda991adef43 \