grub,guile,cpio,tar,wget: Fix gnulib for absense of gets in eglibc

eglibc 2.16 does not export gets anymore

(From OE-Core rev: 043d67c6677fa87496c4c441e9d366e2003ab9aa)

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

Resolved merge conflicts with denzil branch and backported guile
patch.

Signed-off-by: Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

6 files changed, 73 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio-2.11/remove-gets.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio-2.11/remove-gets.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b4d113d3a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio-2.11/remove-gets.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+ISO C11 removes the specification of gets() from the C language, eglibc 2.16+ removed it
+
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+Index: cpio-2.11/gnu/stdio.in.h
+===================================================================
+--- cpio-2.11.orig/gnu/stdio.in.h       2012-07-04 12:13:43.133066247 -0700
++++ cpio-2.11/gnu/stdio.in.h    2012-07-04 12:14:10.189067564 -0700
+@@ -138,8 +138,10 @@
+ /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
+    so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning.  Assume it is
+    always declared, since it is required by C89.  */
++#if defined gets
+ #undef gets
+ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
++#endif
+ 
+ #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
+ # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb
index 78da20e3d4..75fa2b1928 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/cpio/cpio_2.11.bb
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ include cpio_v2.inc
 LICENSE = "GPLv3"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=f27defe1e96c2e1ecd4e0c9be8967949"
 
-PR = "r1"
+PR = "r2"
+
+SRC_URI += "file://remove-gets.patch \
+           "
 
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "1112bb6c45863468b5496ba128792f6c"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "601b1d774cd6e4cd39416203c91ec59dbd65dd27d79d75e1a9b89497ea643978"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2429d429ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar-1.26/remove-gets.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+ISO C11 removes the specification of gets() from the C language, eglibc 2.16+ removed it
+
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+Index: tar-1.26/gnu/stdio.in.h
+===================================================================
+--- tar-1.26.orig/gnu/stdio.in.h        2011-03-12 01:14:33.000000000 -0800
++++ tar-1.26/gnu/stdio.in.h     2012-07-04 12:18:58.997081535 -0700
+@@ -163,8 +163,10 @@
+ /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
+    so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning.  Assume it is
+    always declared, since it is required by C89.  */
++#if defined gets
+ #undef gets
+ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
++#endif
+ 
+ #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
+ # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.26.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.26.bb
index e679ccbf00..dfe63b1315 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.26.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.26.bb
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ require tar.inc
 LICENSE = "GPLv3"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
 
-PR = "r1"
+PR = "r2"
+
+SRC_URI += "file://remove-gets.patch \
+           "
 
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "2cee42a2ff4f1cd4f9298eeeb2264519"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "5a5369f464502a598e938029c310d4b3abd51e6bb8dfd045663e61c8ea9f6d41"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget-1.13.4/remove-gets.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget-1.13.4/remove-gets.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ed1d019383
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget-1.13.4/remove-gets.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+ISO C11 removes the specification of gets() from the C language, eglibc 2.16+ removed it
+
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+Index: wget-1.13.4/lib/stdio.in.h
+===================================================================
+--- wget-1.13.4.orig/lib/stdio.in.h     2011-09-13 01:15:14.000000000 -0700
++++ wget-1.13.4/lib/stdio.in.h  2012-07-04 12:22:45.749092515 -0700
+@@ -693,11 +693,13 @@
+ _GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s));
+ #  undef gets
+ # endif
++# if defined gets
+ _GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets);
+ /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
+    so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning.  Assume it is
+    always declared, since it is required by C89.  */
+ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
++# endif
+ #endif
+ 
+ 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget_1.13.4.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget_1.13.4.bb
index e20ff48a75..9a9441eafc 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget_1.13.4.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/wget/wget_1.13.4.bb
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
-PR = "${INC_PR}.2"
+PR = "${INC_PR}.3"
 
 SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/wget/wget-${PV}.tar.gz \
            file://fix_makefile.patch \
+           file://remove-gets.patch \
           "
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "1df489976a118b9cbe1b03502adbfc27"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "24c7710bc9f220ce23d8a9e0f5673b0efc1cace62db6de0239b5863ecc934dcd"