rpm: Do not require that ELF binaries are executable to be identifiable

There is nothing that requires, e.g., a DSO to be executable, but it
is still an ELF binary and should be identified as such.

(From OE-Core rev: 8d9cca4956ba1d8438e185af8baa2b64809d7c86)

Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb
index 7665d54cdc..15880377b8 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_git.bb
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ SRC_URI = "git://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm \
            file://0001-Fix-build-with-musl-C-library.patch \
            file://0001-Add-a-color-setting-for-mips64_n32-binaries.patch \
            file://0001-Add-PYTHON_ABI-when-searching-for-python-libraries.patch \
+           file://0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch \
            "
 
 PV = "4.13.90+git${SRCPV}"