License Field Cleanup: Non-standard field names

I've cleaned up some odd license fields, fixed some license
names and corrected some incorrect licenses. LICENSE really needs
a pass through by the maintainers as some of the licensing is
incorrect.

Also, every license with Artistic should be gone through and noted as
which version of Artistic.

(From OE-Core rev: 4786ecdf7cd427089464dcb62579110d494e7cd7)

Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyrex_0.9.9.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyrex_0.9.9.bb
index bba84ce4a5..f14a0e615a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyrex_0.9.9.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyrex_0.9.9.bb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ It's designed to bridge the gap between the nice, high-level, easy-to-use world
 and the messy, low-level world of C."
 SECTION = "devel/python"
 PRIORITY = "optional"
-LICENSE = "Apache License Version 2.0"
+LICENSE = "Apache-2"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.txt;md5=771d472f53f933033f57eeee7808e5bd"
 SRCNAME = "Pyrex"
 PR = "ml0"