gcc-4.8: Add recipes

(From OE-Core rev: c850415a1bdbb9268114d90fd0fc4cb3479de9c5)

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8/disablesdt.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8/disablesdt.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8946afc11a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.8/disablesdt.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+We don't list dtrace in DEPENDS so we shouldn't be depending on this header. 
+It may or may not exist from preivous builds though. To be determinstic, disable
+sdt.h usage always. This avoids build failures if the header is removed after configure
+but before libgcc is compiled for example.
+
+RP 2012/8/7
+
+Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [hack]
+
+Index: git/gcc/configure
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/gcc/configure      2012-08-07 21:18:42.319247701 +0000
++++ git/gcc/configure   2012-08-07 21:19:08.939247082 +0000
+@@ -26758,12 +26758,12 @@
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking sys/sdt.h in the target C library" >&5
+ $as_echo_n "checking sys/sdt.h in the target C library... " >&6; }
+ have_sys_sdt_h=no
+-if test -f $target_header_dir/sys/sdt.h; then
+-  have_sys_sdt_h=yes
+-
+-$as_echo "#define HAVE_SYS_SDT_H 1" >>confdefs.h
+-
+-fi
++#if test -f $target_header_dir/sys/sdt.h; then
++#  have_sys_sdt_h=yes
++#
++#$as_echo "#define HAVE_SYS_SDT_H 1" >>confdefs.h
++#
++#fi
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $have_sys_sdt_h" >&5
+ $as_echo "$have_sys_sdt_h" >&6; }
+