glibc: Update to glibc 2.30

- Drop backported patches
- Move common pieces between cross-localedef and glibc into a common file
- Move latest checksums to glibc-common.inc and remove duplicates from glibc recipe
- Detailed release notes [1]

[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-08/msg00029.html

(From OE-Core rev: fe75808dca4bb56ac703d18ebbad4004678f69da)

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0015-yes-within-the-path-sets-wrong-config-variables.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0015-yes-within-the-path-sets-wrong-config-variables.patch
index f2e1802392..dd6562a631 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0015-yes-within-the-path-sets-wrong-config-variables.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0015-yes-within-the-path-sets-wrong-config-variables.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-From e8a88fb3bb6ffcc43871a7caf7ad9c59bd183e50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 7c57f84bef4aaffe4204a7a354411ab3ea7e5273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:31:06 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH 15/30] 'yes' within the path sets wrong config variables
+Subject: [PATCH 15/28] 'yes' within the path sets wrong config variables
 
 It seems that the 'AC_EGREP_CPP(yes...' example is quite popular
 but being such a short word to grep it is likely to produce
@@ -259,5 +259,5 @@ index f9cba6e15d..b21f72f1e4 100644
      ], libc_cv_ppc64_def_call_elf=yes, libc_cv_ppc64_def_call_elf=no)])
    if test $libc_cv_ppc64_def_call_elf = no; then
 -- 
-2.20.1
+2.22.0