oeqa/selftest/tinfoil: Add test for separate config_data with recipe_parse_file()

We've seen two different regressions in this API since it is used by
layer-index but not be the core code. Add a test for it to try and
ensure we don't break it again.

(From OE-Core rev: b07de5de43ec9c9a2c5d496a64940ccdc5b47cf8)

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
index 0a66615fd1..dd13c20402 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
@@ -66,6 +66,20 @@ class TinfoilTests(OESelftestTestCase):
             localdata.setVar('PN', 'hello')
             self.assertEqual('hello', localdata.getVar('BPN'))
 
+    # The config_data API tp parse_recipe_file is used by:
+    # layerindex-web layerindex/update_layer.py
+    def test_parse_recipe_custom_data(self):
+        with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
+            tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False, quiet=2)
+            localdata = bb.data.createCopy(tinfoil.config_data)
+            localdata.setVar("TESTVAR", "testval")
+            testrecipe = 'mdadm'
+            best = tinfoil.find_best_provider(testrecipe)
+            if not best:
+                self.fail('Unable to find recipe providing %s' % testrecipe)
+            rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(best[3], config_data=localdata)
+            self.assertEqual("testval", rd.getVar('TESTVAR'))
+
     def test_list_recipes(self):
         with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
             tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False, quiet=2)