default-distrovars.inc: drop obsolete LGPLv2_WHITELIST_GPL-3.0

There doesn't seem to be a clear reason to have two separate
variables to hold whitelisted GPLv3 recipes. Both variables are
treated the same, so adding a recipe to LGPLv2_WHITELIST_GPL-3.0 is
already equivalent to adding it to WHITELIST_GPL-3.0.

Anyone needing to whitelist a GPLv3 recipe should now just use
WHITELIST_GPL-3.0.

(From OE-Core rev: d4dea76fbe9765d489e3e522a9d2c22049610c7b)

Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index d5798f9c48..7c42cf95e1 100644
--- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
@@ -520,19 +520,18 @@ python () {
             incompatwl = []
             for lic in bad_licenses:
                 spdx_license = return_spdx(d, lic)
-                for w in ["LGPLv2_WHITELIST_", "WHITELIST_"]:
-                    whitelist.extend((d.getVar(w + lic) or "").split())
-                    if spdx_license:
-                        whitelist.extend((d.getVar(w + spdx_license) or "").split())
-                    '''
-                    We need to track what we are whitelisting and why. If pn is
-                    incompatible we need to be able to note that the image that
-                    is created may infact contain incompatible licenses despite
-                    INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE being set.
-                    '''
-                    incompatwl.extend((d.getVar(w + lic) or "").split())
-                    if spdx_license:
-                        incompatwl.extend((d.getVar(w + spdx_license) or "").split())
+                whitelist.extend((d.getVar("WHITELIST_" + lic) or "").split())
+                if spdx_license:
+                    whitelist.extend((d.getVar("WHITELIST_" + spdx_license) or "").split())
+                '''
+                We need to track what we are whitelisting and why. If pn is
+                incompatible we need to be able to note that the image that
+                is created may infact contain incompatible licenses despite
+                INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE being set.
+                '''
+                incompatwl.extend((d.getVar("WHITELIST_" + lic) or "").split())
+                if spdx_license:
+                    incompatwl.extend((d.getVar("WHITELIST_" + spdx_license) or "").split())
 
             if not pn in whitelist:
                 pkgs = d.getVar('PACKAGES').split()