diff options
author | Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com> | 2013-01-28 11:18:25 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-01-30 14:10:02 +0000 |
commit | d029e786b56b1e38fc5ac7243ba61672f47a7e18 (patch) | |
tree | 09f56a4922804d8f227aec1f0e4af7b2422f398f /documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml | |
parent | b80e98362039281873e2d8df1badb4c223e2d69f (diff) | |
download | poky-d029e786b56b1e38fc5ac7243ba61672f47a7e18.tar.gz |
kernel-dev: Added new appendix for kernel concepts.
(From yocto-docs rev: e25465c6d177a27d3dee742ebc958ae30f968ffa)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml')
-rw-r--r-- | documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml | 89 |
1 files changed, 89 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d78d2dc86c --- /dev/null +++ b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ | |||
1 | <!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" | ||
2 | "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" | ||
3 | [<!ENTITY % poky SYSTEM "../poky.ent"> %poky; ] > | ||
4 | |||
5 | <appendix id='kernel-dev-concepts-appx'> | ||
6 | <title>Advanced Kernel Concepts</title> | ||
7 | |||
8 | <section id='kernel-big-picture'> | ||
9 | <title>Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance</title> | ||
10 | <para> | ||
11 | Kernels available through the Yocto Project, like other kernels, are based off the Linux | ||
12 | kernel releases from <ulink url='http://www.kernel.org'></ulink>. | ||
13 | At the beginning of a major development cycle, the Yocto Project team | ||
14 | chooses its kernel based on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release | ||
15 | timing of final upstream <filename>kernel.org</filename> versions, and Yocto Project | ||
16 | feature requirements. | ||
17 | Typically, the kernel chosen is in the | ||
18 | final stages of development by the community. | ||
19 | In other words, the kernel is in the release | ||
20 | candidate or "rc" phase and not yet a final release. | ||
21 | But, by being in the final stages of external development, the team knows that the | ||
22 | <filename>kernel.org</filename> final release will clearly be within the early stages of | ||
23 | the Yocto Project development window. | ||
24 | </para> | ||
25 | <para> | ||
26 | This balance allows the team to deliver the most up-to-date kernel | ||
27 | possible, while still ensuring that the team has a stable official release for | ||
28 | the baseline Linux kernel version. | ||
29 | </para> | ||
30 | <para> | ||
31 | The ultimate source for kernels available through the Yocto Project are released kernels | ||
32 | from <filename>kernel.org</filename>. | ||
33 | In addition to a foundational kernel from <filename>kernel.org</filename>, the | ||
34 | kernels available contain a mix of important new mainline | ||
35 | developments, non-mainline developments (when there is no alternative), | ||
36 | Board Support Package (BSP) developments, | ||
37 | and custom features. | ||
38 | These additions result in a commercially released Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters | ||
39 | to specific embedded designer needs for targeted hardware. | ||
40 | </para> | ||
41 | <para> | ||
42 | Once a kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team goes into | ||
43 | their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev) cycle, while still | ||
44 | continuing maintenance on the released kernel. | ||
45 | It is important to note that the most sustainable and stable way | ||
46 | to include feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process. | ||
47 | Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from various | ||
48 | kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise quality. | ||
49 | </para> | ||
50 | <para> | ||
51 | During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis of | ||
52 | kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select the best | ||
53 | possible <filename>kernel.org</filename> version. | ||
54 | The team continually monitors community kernel | ||
55 | development to look for significant features of interest. | ||
56 | The team does consider back-porting large features if they have a significant advantage. | ||
57 | User or community demand can also trigger a back-port or creation of new | ||
58 | functionality in the Yocto Project baseline kernel during the uprev cycle. | ||
59 | </para> | ||
60 | <para> | ||
61 | Generally speaking, every new kernel both adds features and introduces new bugs. | ||
62 | These consequences are the basic properties of upstream kernel development and are | ||
63 | managed by the Yocto Project team's kernel strategy. | ||
64 | It is the Yocto Project team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released kernel. | ||
65 | They only consider back-porting significant technological jumps - and, that is done | ||
66 | after a complete gap analysis. | ||
67 | The reason for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change | ||
68 | from an evolving kernel can easily create mismatches, incompatibilities and very | ||
69 | subtle errors. | ||
70 | </para> | ||
71 | <para> | ||
72 | These policies result in both a stable and a cutting | ||
73 | edge kernel that mixes forward ports of existing features and significant and critical | ||
74 | new functionality. | ||
75 | Forward porting functionality in the kernels available through the Yocto Project kernel | ||
76 | can be thought of as a "micro uprev." | ||
77 | The many “micro uprevs” produce a kernel version with a mix of | ||
78 | important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and feature integrations. | ||
79 | This kernel gives insight into new features and allows focused | ||
80 | amounts of testing to be done on the kernel, which prevents | ||
81 | surprises when selecting the next major uprev. | ||
82 | The quality of these cutting edge kernels is evolving and the kernels are used in leading edge | ||
83 | feature and BSP development. | ||
84 | </para> | ||
85 | </section> | ||
86 | </appendix> | ||
87 | <!-- | ||
88 | vim: expandtab tw=80 ts=4 | ||
89 | --> | ||