diff options
| author | Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> | 2020-07-09 09:06:15 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-07-16 22:28:40 +0100 |
| commit | 5a63668dbbc410489ac6a88cb79e1a265cde77ac (patch) | |
| tree | 7002a1169b09d5b143aec63fa7e29731bd9e19e4 /bitbake/lib/bb | |
| parent | 0783727c5cab10018a5e45af6b2e3f81942fa916 (diff) | |
| download | poky-5a63668dbbc410489ac6a88cb79e1a265cde77ac.tar.gz | |
coreutils: don't split stdbuf to own package with single-binary
Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
PACKAGECONFIG is used:
ERROR: coreutils-8.32-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/stdbuf contained in package coreutils-stdbuf requires /usr/bin/coreutils, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_coreutils-stdbuf? [file-rdeps]
ERROR: coreutils-8.32-r0 do_package_qa: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
With that PACKAGECONFIG, /usr/bin/stdbuf is just a simple "script"
containing the single line
#!/usr/bin/coreutils --coreutils-prog-shebang=stdbuf
Since there's no point splitting stdbuf to its own package when all
the functionality is in the single big coreutils binary anyway, fix
this by not creating the separate stdbuf package for the single-binary
case. But also make sure that the coreutils-stdbuf item always exists
so recipes can always RDEPEND on coreutils-stdbuf.
(From OE-Core rev: c2ad3af9da9bb3a98c1d5d1b3d21eb8db643c189)
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 74d24b5b895198898944260136d05e991a203c11)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'bitbake/lib/bb')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions