bitbake: runqueue: Handle cases where siginfo is now a parameter to the hashvadlidate function

In some cases we need to check specifically for siginfo files, in
some cases we need to check for the actual sstate objects themselves.

Therefore make this a parameter to the function. A fallback to the
previous function style is maintained for now.

(Bitbake rev: 18d3a03e1b07c98b2dce46eb94f30de1a2b4320b)

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py
index b1fe6b8a7b..7ec3ab8fa8 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py
@@ -1154,9 +1154,14 @@ class RunQueue:
             sq_hash.append(self.rqdata.runq_hash[task])
             sq_taskname.append(taskname)
             sq_task.append(task)
-        call = self.hashvalidate + "(sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d)"
         locs = { "sq_fn" : sq_fn, "sq_task" : sq_taskname, "sq_hash" : sq_hash, "sq_hashfn" : sq_hashfn, "d" : self.cooker.expanded_data }
-        valid = bb.utils.better_eval(call, locs)
+        try:
+            call = self.hashvalidate + "(sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d, siginfo=True)"
+            valid = bb.utils.better_eval(call, locs)
+        # Handle version with no siginfo parameter
+        except TypeError:
+            call = self.hashvalidate + "(sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d)"
+            valid = bb.utils.better_eval(call, locs)
         for v in valid:
             valid_new.add(sq_task[v])