bitbake: cooker: fix indirect multiconfig dependencies

When an indirect multiconfig dependency exists, such as:

A depends on B, B has a multiconfig dependency to C,and our build
target is A, the multiconfig dependency to C is not processed on
time, hence no providers are added for it, causing an exception in
the runqueue because the dependency does exist in it.

Call add_unresolved() for all available multiconfigs before processing
providers for multiconfig dependencies, detecting mcdepends on time so
providers for them can be added correctly.

(Bitbake rev: 8a6bc7584ad61b4de98af92a86066602006262f9)

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <alejandr@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py
index 18979362b6..db52964c3a 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py
@@ -639,27 +639,38 @@ class BBCooker:
             runlist.append([mc, k, ktask, fn])
             bb.event.fire(bb.event.TreeDataPreparationProgress(current, len(fulltargetlist)), self.data)
 
-        mcdeps = taskdata[mc].get_mcdepends()
+
         # No need to do check providers if there are no mcdeps or not an mc build
-        if mcdeps and mc:
-            # Make sure we can provide the multiconfig dependency
-            seen = set()
-            new = True
-            while new:
-                new = False
-                for mc in self.multiconfigs:
-                    for k in mcdeps:
-                        if k in seen:
-                            continue
-                        l = k.split(':')
-                        depmc = l[2]
-                        if depmc not in self.multiconfigs:
-                            bb.fatal("Multiconfig dependency %s depends on nonexistent mc configuration %s" % (k,depmc))
-                        else:
-                            logger.debug(1, "Adding providers for multiconfig dependency %s" % l[3])
-                            taskdata[depmc].add_provider(localdata[depmc], self.recipecaches[depmc], l[3])
-                            seen.add(k)
-                            new = True
+        if mc:
+            # Add unresolved first, so we can get multiconfig indirect dependencies on time
+            for mcavailable in self.multiconfigs:
+                # The first element is empty
+                if mcavailable:
+                    taskdata[mcavailable].add_unresolved(localdata[mcavailable], self.recipecaches[mcavailable])
+
+
+            mcdeps = taskdata[mc].get_mcdepends()
+
+            if mcdeps:
+                # Make sure we can provide the multiconfig dependency
+                seen = set()
+                new = True
+                while new:
+                    new = False
+                    for mc in self.multiconfigs:
+                        for k in mcdeps:
+                            if k in seen:
+                                continue
+                            l = k.split(':')
+                            depmc = l[2]
+                            if depmc not in self.multiconfigs:
+                                bb.fatal("Multiconfig dependency %s depends on nonexistent mc configuration %s" % (k,depmc))
+                            else:
+                                logger.debug(1, "Adding providers for multiconfig dependency %s" % l[3])
+                                taskdata[depmc].add_provider(localdata[depmc], self.recipecaches[depmc], l[3])
+                                seen.add(k)
+                                new = True
+
         for mc in self.multiconfigs:
             taskdata[mc].add_unresolved(localdata[mc], self.recipecaches[mc])