diff options
| author | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-06-19 14:03:39 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-06-20 13:10:47 +0100 |
| commit | 5af68d42ba62a2a18d1b0cdacad8e32c2b119255 (patch) | |
| tree | 46d8d1c8fc154ad31798ec94b7665c121747ee58 /bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2 | |
| parent | de1841d9c2a0ec1d7103335d450b5fbc2273804e (diff) | |
| download | poky-5af68d42ba62a2a18d1b0cdacad8e32c2b119255.tar.gz | |
bitbake: runqueue/build: Add recideptask flag
Currently, tasks like fetchall are slightly broken since if a recipe
has specific [depends] which occur after do_fetch and add items not listed
in DEPENDS and RDEPENDS, they are not caught by recrdeptask. We've gone
around in circles on this issue (e.g
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py?id=5fa6036d49ed7befe6ad50ec95c61a50aec48195
) and in many cases the behaviour of recrdepends is correct but tasks like
fetchall need the other behaviour.
To address this we add a recideptask flag which can be used in conjuction
with the recrdeptask flag to specify which task to to the inspection upon.
This means entries like do_rootfs[depends] which have do_fetch tasks are
caught and run.
I'm not 100% happy with needing another flag but I don't see any rational
way to get the correct behaviour in all cases without it.
[YOCTO #4597]
(Bitbake rev: f8c9b292b02ce2c28741b74901205f5e5807ca87)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions