summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/MAINTAINERS.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2021-07-20 19:26:21 +0100
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2021-07-24 16:33:46 +0100
commita926dd6cdd66ada6febf9638a1916dc988c6e1c8 (patch)
treece93eedc510c14f4e3b086ab7e0f964f1ec62a7e /MAINTAINERS.md
parent17aabc0127435fc071ed390b09e702dfe2d43cb8 (diff)
downloadpoky-a926dd6cdd66ada6febf9638a1916dc988c6e1c8.tar.gz
Add MAINTAINERS.md file
We have a long history with maintainers files and good and bad experiences. There are people who'd like to see a kernel style machine readable file which defines exactly which people should be reviewing which areas. In practise, the files we do have struggle to stay up to date (e.g. the recipe maintainers file) and such a file would also cause conflicts of expectations where person X would want to be cc'd on patches touching file Y and want a revert if they hadn't acked it. We also don't have clearly defined boundaries in some areas, e.g. toolchain. We have a wide peer review system and nobody gets to make changes without that review, even myself as the lead for OE-Core/Bitbake. I do want to recognise that some people are key experts on particular areas and hightlight that their views on those areas do carry weight. With that also comes repsonsibility to help try and figure out bugs, help with review and so on. I've tried to strike a balance with this file to detail who some of the experts for particular areas are and to also highlight where we don't have coverage and that there are opportunities. I've tried to put the file in the wider context of the project, not just OE-Core. It is in a repo rather than a wiki so we have visibility to changes through the change control process. I'm sure I will miss people, sorry, it is inevitable when you try and make a list. There may be people who want to step down and don't want to be in this role, I'm also hoping there are going to be some new volunteers to help in some areas. Please do send follow up updates, this patch is really meant to help get us started. Volunteers to maintainer specific areas of the project are very welcome and feel free to reach out to ask about areas or getting started and working towards an official maintainer role (e.g. help with bug fixing). (From OE-Core rev: b629978efae35d5ea3821f4375bc0d8228b6cc26) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'MAINTAINERS.md')
-rw-r--r--MAINTAINERS.md71
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS.md b/MAINTAINERS.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..604d800f63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MAINTAINERS.md
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
1OpenEmbedded-Core and Yocto Project Maintainer Information
2==========================================================
3
4OpenEmbedded and Yocto Project work jointly together to maintain the metadata,
5layers, tools and sub-projects that make up their ecosystems.
6
7The projects operate through collaborative development. This currently takes
8place on mailing lists for many components as the "pull request on github"
9workflow works well for single or small numbers of maintainers but we have
10a large number, all with different specialisms and benefit from the mailing
11list review process. Changes therefore undergo peer review through mailing
12lists in many cases.
13
14This file aims to acknowledge people with specific skills/knowledge/interest
15both to recognise their contributions but also empower them to help lead and
16curate those components. Where we have people with specialist knowledge in
17particular areas, during review patches/feedback from these people in these
18areas would generally carry weight.
19
20This file is maintained in OE-Core but may refer to components that are separate
21to it if that makes sense in the context of maintainership. The README of specific
22layers and components should ultimately be definitive about the patch process and
23maintainership for the component.
24
25Recipe Maintainers
26------------------
27
28See meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc
29
30Component/Subsystem Maintainers
31-------------------------------
32
33* Kernel (inc. linux-yocto, perf): Bruce Ashfield
34* Reproducible Builds: Joshua Watt
35* Toaster: David Reyna
36* Hash-Equivalence: Joshua Watt
37* Recipe upgrade infrastructure: Alex Kanavin
38* Toolchain: Khem Raj
39* ptest-runner: Aníbal Limón
40* opkg: Alex Stewart
41
42Maintainers needed
43------------------
44
45* Pseudo
46* Layer Index
47* recipetool
48* QA framework/automated testing
49* error reporting system/web UI
50* wic
51* Patchwork
52* Patchtest
53* Prelink-cross
54* Matchbox
55* Sato
56* devtool
57* eSDK
58* Autobuilder
59
60Layer Maintainers needed
61------------------------
62
63* meta-gplv2 (ideally new strategy but active maintainer welcome)
64
65Shadow maintainers/development needed
66--------------------------------------
67
68* toaster
69* bitbake
70
71