From 8cc837d2384d441e56b5006acf9b60503a0a5c8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Davis Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:41:48 -0500 Subject: meta-ti: rename j7-evm to j721e-evm In many places we use "j7" the family when we should be using a specific SoC or EVM and vice-versa. For instance when including graphics drivers we add for all "j7" family, but what we really want is only for some specific j7 SoC. First step in untangling this is to make it clear that there is no SoC called j7. There is a SoC called j721e with a j721e-evm. Fix up this naming here. Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis Tested-by: Denys Dmytriyenko Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon --- meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti') diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb index 8aa823cc..03408528 100644 --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ LEGACY_DM_FW_DIR = "${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/" DM_FIRMWARE = "ipc_echo_testb_mcu1_0_release_strip.xer5f" # J7 HS support -do_install:prepend:j7-hs-evm() { +do_install:prepend:j721e-hs-evm() { export TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG=${TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG} ( cd ${RTOS_DM_FW_DIR}; \ mv ${DM_FIRMWARE} ${DM_FIRMWARE}.unsigned; \ -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf