| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The traditional order of serial consoles for K3 has ttyS2 being the
primary UART attached console. ttyS0 is also a common choice for
distros and the TI kernel may switch at some point. To prepare
we check both UARTs on all K3 devices. Move this common check
to a K3 common location.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We often carry more dtbs/dtbos in our kernel than we have upstreamed.
The inclusion of all of the dtb/dtbo in the KERNEL_DEVICETREE has become
problematic as we start testing the linux-next and 6.1 as part of our
LTS migration. To address this issue we are adding in two step method
for managing the KERNEL_DEVICETREE.
Going forward we will only accept dtb/dtbo in KERNEL_DEVICETREE if it is
available in upstream. This way we ensure that the variable is more
accurate for whichever kernel you might be looking at. We have also
added a new variable KERNEL_DEVICETREE_PREFIX which our kernel recipes
will use to auto set KERNEL_DEVICETREE based on what files are in the
kernel and not a fixed list in the conf files.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the MCSPI loopback overlay file for J721E EVM which helps
users to enable MCU-MAIN MCSPI loopback applications, even though
the overlay is named j7200-mcspi-loopback.dtbo, same can be used
for testing on other J7 platforms as well.
Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add device tree overlay for extending support for mcu_uart0 as well as
wkup_uart0 for boards with J721E SoC. This overlay will mainly be used
for the purpose of testing uart instances.
Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the following overlay files on J721E EVM:
1. Fusion board (For FPDLink-III cameras)
2. IMX390 FPDLink camera module
3. IMX219 RPi-compatible camera module
Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The WIC image for K3 depends on the TI-SCI firmware, on AM65x and J721e
also the bootloader. Make this clear by only depending on firmware in
the base k3.inc file, then adding the bootloader dependency in AM65x and
J721e specific includes.
Remove unneeded overrides from the evm level files.
Remove do_image_tar dependencies as the tar files do not include
the bootloader nor TI-SCI firmware, only the boot partition of
the WIC file needs these.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only the first two K3 devices do not support multi-cert boot so
lets make multi-cert the default and only add back sysfw.itb
for these two devices.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: lines be preserved?
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows us to be more specific around what SoCs we support and
lets us add features based on the SoC family not just at the EVM or
whole J7family level.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Tested-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|
|
In many places we use "j7" the family when we should be using a
specific SoC or EVM and vice-versa. For instance when including
graphics drivers we add for all "j7" family, but what we really
want is only for some specific j7 SoC.
First step in untangling this is to make it clear that there is
no SoC called j7. There is a SoC called j721e with a j721e-evm.
Fix up this naming here.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Tested-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
|