meta-ti: rename j7-evm to j721e-evm

In many places we use "j7" the family when we should be using a
specific SoC or EVM and vice-versa. For instance when including
graphics drivers we add for all "j7" family, but what we really
want is only for some specific j7 SoC.

First step in untangling this is to make it clear that there is
no SoC called j7. There is a SoC called j721e with a j721e-evm.

Fix up this naming here.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Tested-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
index 8aa823cc..03408528 100644
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
+++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ LEGACY_DM_FW_DIR  = "${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/"
 DM_FIRMWARE = "ipc_echo_testb_mcu1_0_release_strip.xer5f"
 
 # J7 HS support
-do_install:prepend:j7-hs-evm() {
+do_install:prepend:j721e-hs-evm() {
         export TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG=${TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG}
         ( cd ${RTOS_DM_FW_DIR}; \
                 mv ${DM_FIRMWARE} ${DM_FIRMWARE}.unsigned; \