summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/files/add-PROT-NONE-to-the-mprotest-test.patch
blob: 673f2046dd6bc395b19c913f7ba6dc08a20c134c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Upstream-Status: Pending

From c7fcb7270bb510d7271a1c0cea095a4dbea49420 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:00:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add PROT_NONE to the mprotect test.

The mprotect unit test checks PROT_READ and PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE
protections. We recently found that PROT_NONE wasn't properly
supported in our huge page kernel code.

This patch adds PROT_NONE tests to mprotect. The expected behaviour
is that neither reads nor writes should succeed.

Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
---
 tests/mprotect.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/mprotect.c b/tests/mprotect.c
index aa4673e..db6a662 100644
--- a/tests/mprotect.c
+++ b/tests/mprotect.c
@@ -213,5 +213,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	test_mprotect(fd, "RW->R 1/2", 2*hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
 		      hpage_size, PROT_READ);
 
+	/* PROT_NONE tests */
+	test_mprotect(fd, "NONE->R", hpage_size, PROT_NONE,
+		      hpage_size, PROT_READ);
+	test_mprotect(fd, "NONE->RW", hpage_size, PROT_NONE,
+		      hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE);
+
 	PASS();
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5