ipmctl: upgrade 03.00.00.0369 -> 03.00.00.0387

Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal@intel.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 66 deletions

diff --git a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 4a3b26c7..00000000
--- a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
-From cc0e412ad05574d22938586172c56863666eb2a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Nolan Hergert <nolan.hergert@intel.com>
-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 11:15:09 +0800
-Subject: [PATCH] Ignore STATIC_ASSERT and NULL definition so we can compile in
- OS
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport [from ipmctl patches; https://github.com/intel/ipmctl/blob/development/src/os/patches/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch]
-
-Signed-off-by: Nolan Hergert <nolan.hergert@intel.com>
-Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@intel.com>
----
- MdePkg/Include/Base.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Base.h b/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
-index 8e4271f6ea..c39511a064 100644
---- a/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
-+++ b/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
-@@ -318,7 +318,11 @@ struct _LIST_ENTRY {
- ///
- /// NULL pointer (VOID *)
- ///
-+#ifndef OS_BUILD
-+#ifndef UNIT_TEST_UEFI_BUILD
- #define NULL  ((VOID *) 0)
-+#endif
-+#endif
- 
- //
- // Null character
-@@ -809,7 +813,8 @@ typedef UINTN  *BASE_LIST;
- // Verify that ProcessorBind.h produced UEFI Data Types that are compliant with
- // Section 2.3.1 of the UEFI 2.3 Specification.
- //
--
-+#ifndef OS_BUILD
-+#ifndef UNIT_TEST_UEFI_BUILD
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (BOOLEAN) == 1, "sizeof (BOOLEAN) does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (INT8)    == 1, "sizeof (INT8) does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (UINT8)   == 1, "sizeof (UINT8) does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
-@@ -821,6 +826,8 @@ STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (INT64)   == 8, "sizeof (INT64) does not meet UEFI Specifi
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (UINT64)  == 8, "sizeof (UINT64) does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (CHAR8)   == 1, "sizeof (CHAR8) does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (CHAR16)  == 2, "sizeof (CHAR16) does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
-+#endif
-+#endif
- 
- //
- // The following three enum types are used to verify that the compiler
-@@ -841,9 +848,13 @@ typedef enum {
-   __VerifyUint32EnumValue = 0xffffffff
- } __VERIFY_UINT32_ENUM_SIZE;
- 
-+#ifndef OS_BUILD
-+#ifndef UNIT_TEST_UEFI_BUILD
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (__VERIFY_UINT8_ENUM_SIZE) == 4, "Size of enum does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (__VERIFY_UINT16_ENUM_SIZE) == 4, "Size of enum does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (__VERIFY_UINT32_ENUM_SIZE) == 4, "Size of enum does not meet UEFI Specification Data Type requirements");
-+#endif
-+#endif
- 
- /**
-   Macro that returns a pointer to the data structure that contains a specified field of
--- 
-2.17.1
-